Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of quality assessment for the studies included

From: Organ and tissue donation in clinical settings: a systematic review of the impact of interventions aimed at health professionals

 

Population

Intervention

Assessment tool(s)a

Analysis

Papers

Randomization

Justification of sample size

Control group

Allocation concealment

Underlying theory

Validity

Reliability

Intention-to-treat

Attrition rate

Alonso, Fernandez, Mataix et al. (1999)

No

Not mentioned

No

N/A

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Beasley, Capossela, Brigham, Gunderson and Gortmaker (1997)

No

No

No

N/A

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Bleakley (2010)

No

No

No

N/A

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Dettle, Sagel and Chrysler (1994)

No

No

Yes (but no statistical comparison between groups)

Not mentioned

None

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

no

40% attrition;

No analysis of dropouts

Kittur, McMenamin and Knott (1990)

No

No

Yes

Not randomly assigned

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Light (1987)

No

No

Yes (but no statistical comparison between groups)

Not randomly assigned

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Milanés, Gonzalez, Hernandez, Arminio, Clesca and Rivas-Vetencourt (2003)

No

No

No

N/A

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Nelson, Marymont, Durand, Reyes and Davis (1992)

Random cluster probability method

No

Yes

Not randomly assigned

None

Field testing of the questionnaire (but validity/reliability assessment not detailed)

N/A

N/A

Niday, Painter, Peak et al. (2007)

No

No

No

N/A

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Riker and White (1995)

No

No

Yes

Not randomly assigned

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Shafer, Durand, Hueneke, et al. (1998)

No

No

No

N/A

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Stark, Wikoren and Martone (1994)

No

No

No

N/A

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Taylor, Young and Kneteman (1997)

No

No

No

N/A

‘Change theory’ (not referenced)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Van Gelder, Van Hees, de Roey, Monbaliu, Aerts, Coosemans et al. (2006)

No

No

No

N/A

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Wight, Cohen, Roels and Miranda (2000)

No

No

No

N/A

None

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

  1. aThe assessment tools assessed were only those regarding outcomes assessed in this systematic review, that is, professional practices or donation rates; when the outcome was an objective measure (donation rate or any quantitative item retrieved from medical records review), validity and reliability were considered nonapplicable.
  2. N/A, not applicable.