Open Access

Development of a preclinical model of donation after circulatory determination of death for translational application

  • Géraldine Allain1, 2,
  • Thomas Kerforne1, 3,
  • Rodolphe Thuret1, 4,
  • Pierre-Olivier Delpech1, 5,
  • Thibaut Saint-Yves1, 5,
  • Michel Pinsard1, 3, 4,
  • Thierry Hauet1, 6, 7, 8Email author,
  • Sébastien Giraud1, 7,
  • Christophe Jayle1, 2, 6, 8 and
  • Benoît Barrou1, 9, 10
Transplantation Research20143:13

DOI: 10.1186/2047-1440-3-13

Received: 8 April 2014

Accepted: 4 June 2014

Published: 14 June 2014



Extracorporeal membranous oxygenation is proposed for abdominal organ procurement from donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD). In France, the national Agency of Biomedicine supervises the procurement of kidneys from DCD, specifying the durations of tolerated warm and cold ischemia. However, no study has determined the optimal conditions of this technique. The aim of this work was to develop a preclinical model of DCD using abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation (ANOR). In short, our objectives are to characterize the mechanisms involved during ANOR and its impact on abdominal organs.


We used Large White pigs weighing between 45 and 55 kg. After 30 minutes of potassium-induced cardiac arrest, the descending thoracic aorta was clamped and ANOR set up between the inferior vena cava and the abdominal aorta for 4 hours. Hemodynamic, respiratory and biochemical parameters were collected. Blood gasometry and biochemistry analysis were performed during the ANOR procedure.


Six ANOR procedures were performed. The surgical procedure is described and intraoperative parameters and biological data are presented. Pump flow rates were between 2.5 and 3 l/min. Hemodynamic, respiratory, and biochemical objectives were achieved under reproducible conditions. Interestingly, animals remained hemodynamically stable following the targeted protocol. Arterial pH was controlled, and natremia and renal function remained stable 4 hours after the procedure was started. Decreased hemoglobin and serum proteins levels, concomitant with increased lactate dehydrogenase activity, were observed as a consequence of the surgery. The serum potassium level was increased, owing to the extracorporeal circulation circuit.


Our ANOR model is the closest to clinical conditions reported in the literature and will allow the study of the systemic and abdominal organ impact of this technique. The translational relevance of the pig will permit the determination of new biomarkers and protocols to improve DCD donor management.


Animal model Donation after circulatory determination of death Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Ischemia/reperfusion injury Organ donor management


Transplantation is the best alternative to end-stage organ disease[1]. The increasing number of patients waiting for an organ has led transplant teams to consider new sources of organs. A possible answer to this organ shortage is the use of organs from donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD)[2]. Cardiac arrest may be unexpected (type I and II of the Maastricht classification), or occur after life-sustaining care withdrawal (type III of the Maastricht classification). One of the challenges of DCD management is to correct or prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury due to the unavoidable period of warm ischemia. Warm ischemia is usually more pronounced in uncontrolled donation and it is of utmost importance to define an effective method to limit it. As this method will be applied after death certification in uncontrolled donors, it will not raise the usual ethical concerns that can be encountered in controlled donation.

In renal transplantation centers using kidneys from DCD, it has been shown that this organ source could increase the donor pool by 20 to 40%[3]. However, organs from these donors are more prone to ischemia-reperfusion injury because DCD kidneys suffer a period of warm ischemic damage (no-flow and low-flow periods) in addition to cold ischemia during ex-vivo conservation. Consequently, the risk of primary nonfunction and delayed graft function is higher[4, 5].

Methods for conditioning abdominal organs before removal have evolved. Initially, protocols were limited to in-situ cooling using an intra-aortic double balloon catheter or Gillot’s catheter[6, 7]. This technique is referred to as cold in-situ perfusion. Since the middle of the 1990s, normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been proposed, either in hypothermic conditions for total body cooling or in normothermic conditions limited to the abdomen using abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation (ANOR). This method has been developed and applied by several groups around the world[812]. This technique uses a normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit with cannulae introduced by a femoral approach and an occlusive balloon positioned in the descending thoracic aorta to limit circulation to the abdominal region.

In France, a national protocol was designed to use exclusively uncontrolled donors (DCD type II of the Maastricht classification). The program started in 2007 and the protocol is summarized in Figure 1[13]. In 2000, a team from Barcelona compared kidney preservation with cold in-situ perfusion, hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, and ANOR[8]. A significant decrease in primary nonfunction and delayed graft function with satisfactory long-term graft survival was identified for the ANOR group. Several other groups have reported their experiences with ANOR in uncontrolled and controlled donors and suggested the superiority of ANOR in DCD, as compared with cold in-situ perfusion (for a review, see[14]). However, no formal demonstration has been established.
Figure 1

Recommendations for kidney removal from donation after cardiac death according to the French national regulatory authority. ANOR, abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation.

Many issues remain to be addressed regarding the ideal protocol, such as ideal temperature and optimal duration. The use of additives is also a pivotal question. Clearly, experimental work is mandatory to better define the optimal conditions of this technique, which will help to limit or even repair the injuries induced by warm ischemia. The aim of our work was to develop a preclinical model of DCD based on the current recommendations of the French national regulatory authority on the study of kidneys exposed to ANOR and to optimize the conditions under which the technique is used.


Experimental model

The protocol was carried out in accordance with the regulations of the French Ministry of Agriculture, the National Institute for Agronomic Research and the regional ethics committee on animal experiments (Comité d’éthique pour l’expérimentation animale en Poitou-Charentes). The animals were Large White male pigs about 3 months old and weighing between 45 and 55 kg. These animals have been used in the experimental surgery laboratory for 15 years to study ischemia-reperfusion injuries with renal transplantation models[15, 16]. The pig is well suited for preclinical studies because its anatomy and physiology are very similar to those of human beings and it has rapidly been chosen for potential applications in clinical practice[17].

We used a Rotaflow Maquet centrifugal pump with Softline Coating Maquet-Jostra pre-heparinized circuit (Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG, Hirrlingen, Germany). A thermoregulatory system is connected to maintain a temperature of 37°C. The circuit is purged with hydroxyethylamide (Restorvol® 6%, Fresenius Kabi, Sèvres, France). The priming is approximately 700 to 800 cm3.

Anesthetic procedure

Induction of the animal is performed with a Hunter mask with a mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen 50/50 associated with 8% sevoflurane then 2.5% isoflurane. A perfusion line is set at a marginal vein of the ear. Orotracheal intubation is performed under laryngoscopic control. Controlled ventilation is performed with a respiratory rate of 16/min while maintaining expired CO2 between 35 and 45 mmHg. Curarization of the animal is performed by initial injection of 8 mg pancuronium bromide followed by reinjection adapted to the behavior of the animal. Intraoperative analgesia is achieved by intravenous injections of 20 mg nalbuphine and 20 mg nefopam.

Surgical procedure

A video of the procedure is provided in Additional file 1. The animal is placed supine with access to the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal regions (Figure 2). First, a central venous catheter is positioned in the internal jugular vein after right cervicotomy. Then, laparotomy is performed. The abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava under the renal vessels are dissected, since the femoral vessels are too small to receive cannulae of sufficient size to ensure the flow rate used. We chose an extraperitoneal approach to avoid lymphatic losses and to limit vascular filling and hemodilution. Indeed, the formation of a third sector is frequently encountered in renal transplants performed by a transperitoneal approach in the laboratory. A bolus of 300 IU/kg of unfractionated heparin is injected through the central venous catheter. This dosage is recommended by the French national regulatory authority. After 5 minutes, a 14 Fr arterial cannula (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN) is placed in the abdominal aorta under the renal arteries and a 21 Fr long multiperforated venous cannula (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN) is positioned at the junction of the inferior vena cava and the right auricle (Figure 3). Cannulae are introduced according to the Seldinger technique, so as to be completely sealed.Injection of 2 g potassium chloride by the central venous catheter leads to cardiac arrest. Mechanical ventilation is stopped. The descending thoracic aorta is approached by a short left thoracotomy so as to be clamped (Figure 4). Another catheter is placed downstream from the clamp to monitor blood pressure. The laboratory model is shown schematically in Figure 5. After 30 minutes of warm ischemia, ANOR is started for 4 hours.
Figure 2

Installation of the animal for the procedure.
Figure 3

Cannulation of aorta and inferior vena cava under renal vessels by an extraperitoneal approach.
Figure 4

Aortic clamping and arterial catheter through left thoracotomy.
Figure 5

Abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation in the preclinical porcine model. A, central venous catheter; B, aortic clamp; C, arterial catheter; CP, centrifugal pump; D, diaphragm; E, venous canulae in inferior vena cava; F, arterial canulae in aorta; G, perfusion entry; H, gas entry; LH, left heart; LK, left kidney; OM, oxygenation membrane; RH, right heart; RK, right kidney; TS, thermoregulatory system.

Additional file 1: Video of surgical procedure. (MP4 10 MB)

Abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation:

Procedure, progression, and data collection

Monitoring procedures with objectives and corrective actions are summarized in Table 1. Blood samples are collected via the central venous catheter before laparotomy and every hour during the ANOR on the arterial line. Plasmas from heparinized blood are stored for later biochemical analysis. At the end of 4 hours, kidneys are explanted and stored for later analysis. The ANOR is stopped. Cannulae and catheters are removed and the animal is euthanized.
Table 1

Monitoring procedures during abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation

Monitored parameters


Type of monitoring

Corrective actions

Pump flow rate

2.5 to 3 l/min

Continuous monitoring

Vascular filling: saline and hydroxyethyl starch (10 ml/(kg h))

Mean arterial pressure

>60 mmHg

Continuous infusion of noradrenalin on the circuit

Central venous pressure

<5 mmHg



Blood samples on the circuit every 30 minutes

Continuous infusion of sodium bicarbonate on the circuit

Partial pressure of carbon dioxide

30 to 40 mmHg

Sweeping gas flow adjustment

Partial pressure of oxygen

100 to 150 mmHg

Fraction of inspired oxygen adjustment

Activated clotting time

>200 s


Bolus of 5000 IU unfractionated heparin on the circuit

Parameters of monitoring procedures

The pump flow rate was monitored continuously during the procedure. The arterial pressure and central venous pressure were measured continuously during ANOR using a monitor HP 56S (Hewlett-Packard, Les Ulis, France). The partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide, the fraction of inspired oxygen, and the pH were measured every 30 minutes during the procedure, using an i-STAT portable clinical analyzer (Hewlett-Packard, Les Ulis, France). The activated clotting time was also measured every 30 minutes, using a Hemostasis Management System (Medtronic, Boulogne-Billancourt, France).

Levels of plasma potassium, sodium, protein, lactate dehydrogenase (as an acidosis marker), and blood hemoglobin were quantified every hour during the ANOR procedure using an automated chemistry analyzer (Modular, Roche Diagnostics, France). To determine renal function, plasma creatinine was measured every hour during the ANOR, again using an automated chemistry analyzer (Modular, Roche Diagnostics, France).

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. For the statistical analysis among groups, we used NCSS software (NCSS LLC, USA) and ANOVA or two-sample t test analysis in the case of normality (skewness, kurtosis, and omnibus tests) and equality of variance (modified Levene equal-variance test) and the Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple comparison analysis where these parameters were not met. Differences with a P value of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results and discussion

Monitored parameters during abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation

Six 4-hour ANOR procedures were performed. Animal weight varied between 45 and 55 kg. The monitored parameters and objectives are listed in Table 1.

Results for the monitored parameters are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Table 2). The pump flow rate, mean arterial pressure, and central venous pressure were controlled continuously during the ANOR procedure. Partial pressures of oxygen and of carbon dioxide were stabilized during the procedure, between 122 and 173 mmHg and between 30 and 37 mmHg, respectively. There was an exception for activated clotting time, which was rarely above 200 s. It was therefore often necessary to inject 5000 IU unfractionated heparin every 30 minutes during the ANOR process. The objectives, listed in Table 1, were achieved under reproducible conditions.
Table 2

Comparison of monitored parameters during abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation (mean ± standard deviation)








Weight (kg)







Pump flow rate (l/min)

2.5 ± 0.03

2.5 ± 0.03

2.8 ± 0.03

2.7 ± 0.05

2.6 ± 0.05

2.5 ± 0.03

Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)

65 ± 6

64 ± 5

84 ± 3

86 ± 10

77 ± 3

75 ± 6

Noradrenalin (μg/(kg min))

0.7 ± 0.05

1.1 ± 0.19

0.6 ± 0.08

0.6 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.07

0.7 ± 0.15

Fraction of inspired oxygen (%)

56 ± 3

62 ± 5

59 ± 5

45 ± 2

54 ± 1

56 ± 3

Partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg)

123 ± 25

122 ± 16

141 ± 27

173 ± 31

149 ± 13

151 ± 19

Sweeping gas flow (l/min)

3.2 ± 0.2

4 ± 0

4.3 ± 0.2

3.3 ± 0.2

3.6 ± 0.1

3.5 ± 0

Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (mmHg)

37 ± 5

35 ± 1

35 ± 1

32 ± 2

30 ± 1

31 ± 1

Activated clotting time (s)

174 ± 32

183 ± 27

180 ± 21

198 ± 33

173 ± 20

171 ± 20

ANOR, abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation.

Evolution of biological parameters during abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation

The evolution of biological parameters during ANOR is summarized in Table 3. There was no significant difference between T0 and 4 hours of ANOR for pH (7.4 ± 0.01 to 7.4 ± 0.03, respectively), serum sodium concentration (138 ± 1 to 138 ± 1 mmol/l, respectively), serum creatinine concentration (99 ± 6 to 129 ± 27 μmol/l, respectively). Lactate dehydrogenase activity was significantly increased between T0 and 4 hours (714 ± 48 to 1041 ± 204 IU/l, respectively), and was probably related to the stresses of the surgery and muscular attrition. Serum protein and hemoglobin levels showed significant decrease between T0 and 4 hours of ANOR, demonstrating hemodilution and bleeding during surgery (56 ± 3 to 37 ± 3 g/l for serum protein concentration and 12 ± 0.1 to 9.3 ± 0.6 g/dl for hemoglobin level). Correction of serum potassium levels was not perfect, with lower levels at 4 hours than at 1 hour; however, they remained significantly higher than at T0. This was due to the extracorporeal circulation circuit.
Table 3

Evolution of biological parameters during abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation (means ± standard deviation)



1 hour

2 hours

3 hours

4 hours

P T0 versus 4 hours


7.4 ± 0.01

7.42 ± 0.06

7.42 ± 0.03

7.40 ± 0.05

7.44 ± 0.03


Serum potassium (mmol/l)

4.1 ± 0.2

7.1 ± 0.5

7.9 ± 0.3

7.3 ± 0.5

6.8 ± 0.6


Serum sodium (mmol/l)

138 ± 1

136 ± 1

139 ± 1

137 ± 2

139 ± 3


Serum protein (g/l)

56 ± 3

41 ± 3

45 ± 2

39 ± 2

37 ± 3


Hemoglobin (g/dl)

12 ± 0.1

10.9 ± 0.5

11.1 ± 0.5

10.1 ± 0.8

9.3 ± 0.6


Creatinine (μmol/l)

99 ± 6

130 ± 5

132 ± 18

133 ± 21

129 ± 27


Lactate dehydrogenase (IU/l)

714 ± 48

1,036 ± 193

1,354 ± 133

1,132 ± 233

1,041 ± 204


*: statistically significant.


The increasing demand for transplantation has created a need for additional organ sources, and acceptance criteria have been widened, not only for kidney retrieval but increasingly for other organs with a lower tolerance of warm ischemia, such as the liver, pancreas, and lungs[18, 19]. This expansion of donor criteria to include the use of grafts from elderly donors, DCD, or organs from donors with other medical conditions has underlined the need for a technique that prevents any further damage during the preservation period. Previous reports strongly suggest that DCD donors are a valuable source of organs[3, 14, 20, 21]. Reconditioning using ANOR appears to give better results than in-situ cooling preservation, with a reduction of primary nonfunction and delayed graft function[8]. In France, the national regulatory authority (Agence de la Biomédecine) has defined the conditions for organ removal, specifying the tolerated durations of warm and cold ischemia, for uncontrolled donors (type II of the Maastricht classification). However, no preliminary study has determined the optimal conditions for ANOR. Consequently, there is room for experimental studies to decipher the different steps of the protocol.

The development of a porcine preclinical experimental model of DCD donors allows for a study of the ANOR impact on organs without the limitations of a clinical study. Several models of DCD donors have previously been published in the literature to study the conditioning of kidney transplants by normothermic perfusion. Recently, using rats of 300 g and a warm ischemia period corresponding to clamping of the renal artery for 15 or 30 minutes, Moers et al. studied reperfusion for 1 to 2 hours[22]. However, the restored pulsatile flow was far from comparable to a continuous flow of ANOR. In 2008, Hosgood et al. used a Large White pig model weighing between 40 and 50 kg[23]. In this model, after 25 minutes of warm ischemia, kidneys were reperfused normothermically for 3 hours in an isolated organ preservation system using autologous blood. However, this experimental condition remains far from a clinical situation. In 2010, Rojas-Pena et al. used an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit with pigs from 25 to 30 kg[24]. Both external jugular veins were cannulated in place of the inferior vena cava. In addition, the absence of clamping of the descending thoracic aorta mimicked a systemic circulation model, which was not exactly the ANOR condition. The durations of warm ischemia were 10 and 30 minutes, respectively, and 90 and 100 minutes for reperfusion.

To our knowledge, the uncontrolled DCD model presented herein is the closest to the conditions encountered in clinical practice. Indeed, we use a large animal, the pig, well accepted as a preclinical model with a size, anatomy, and cardiovascular physiology very similar to those of human beings. Our model also used truly regional circulation between the inferior vena cava and the abdominal aorta, which was limited to the subdiaphragmatic region by clamping of the descending thoracic aorta. Moreover, our model is highly reproducible. In all cases, hemodynamic and respiratory objectives were achieved with very similar conditions from one animal to another. After 4 hours of ANOR, there was no significant difference compared with T0 for pH and plasma sodium levels. Lactose dehydrogenase levels were increased, a sign of tissue damage that was probably due to the stresses of surgery (incisions, muscular attrition, and so on); the lack of change between 1 and 4 hours of ANOR highlight the fact that this marker is not adapted for discriminant diagnosis determination. We observed an expected hemodilution, mainly due to the ANOR priming (about 700 to 800 cm3). However, hemoglobin levels remained correct, at 9.3 ± 0.6 g/dl after 4 hours of ANOR. Interestingly, in our hands, renal function likewise remained stable during ANOR and reached a steady state during the procedure.

However, the injection of heparin before cardiac arrest is a critical limit in this model. We aim to correct this easily in future protocols. Note that in previously described models, injection of heparin was likewise carried out before cardiac arrest.

It would also have been interesting to monitor urine production during ANOR. However, bladder catheterization of Large White male pigs is not possible, owing to a tortuous urethra and we consequently chose not to approach the bladder surgically, thereby avoiding the opening of the peritoneum and fluid, particularly lymph fluid, accumulation. However, we noted that at the end of ANOR, urine (about 500 cm3) was collected in the bladder. To better monitor kidney function, the implantation of a urine catheter during ANOR is envisioned for future experiments.


We developed a preclinical experimental model of uncontrolled DCD kidneys donors using ANOR. This model will allow the development of experimental procedures and the study of systemic and renal impact of the ANOR at different steps. Many issues could be addressed, such as optimal temperature and duration. This model could help to tailor strategies and to build clinical protocols for preservation and viability prediction and evaluate preservation protocols following ANOR. It is ideal to determine the optimal conditions for pre- and post-conditioning, which hold the potential to reduce graft injury. It will allow comparative studies between ANOR and in-situ cooling preservation. This model can also facilitate the study of conditioning protocols for other abdominal organs with ANOR and the effect of additives on ischemia-reperfusion injury. The translational relevance of the pig also permits the study of relevant biomarkers for real-time evaluation of organ viability during and after ANOR. Finally, the technology is readily available and easy to handle with a relatively short learning curve. Such programs could be included in transplantation operative procedures and surgical skills taught to young European surgeons entering the field of transplantation surgery.



abdominal normothermic oxygenated recirculation


analysis of variance


donation after circulatory determination of death.



We thank Maquet for providing some materials. We also thank William Hebrard, Pierre Couturier, and Catherine Henry for their excellent technical support. Finally, we thank Raphael Thuillier PhD for his support with the editing of the manuscript.


The authors wish especially to thank the sources of funding: INSERM, European Society for Organ Transplantation, Fondation de l’Avenir, Conseil Régional Poitou-Charentes, Université de Poitiers, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Poitiers, Institut National pour la Recherche Agronomique et Société Francophone de Transplantation.

Authors’ Affiliations

INSERM U1082, CHU de Poitiers
CHU de Poitiers, Service de Chirurgie cardio-thoracique
CHU de Poitiers, Service de Réanimation chirurgicale
CHU de Montpellier, Service d’Urologie et de transplantation rénale
CHU de Poitiers, Service d’Urologie
Université de Poitiers, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie
CHU Poitiers, Service de Biochimie
IBISA Platform ‘Experimental Surgery and Transplantation’, INRA, Domaine expérimental du Magneraud
GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Service d’Urologie et de transplantation rénale
UPMC Université Paris VI


  1. Kugler C, Gottlieb J, Warnecke G, Schwarz A, Weissenborn K, Barg-Hock H, Bara C, Einhorn I, Haverich A, Haller H: Health-related quality of life after solid organ transplantation: a prospective, multiorgan cohort study. Transplantation. 2013, 96: 316-323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nuñez JR, Del Rio F, Lopez E, Moreno MA, Soria A, Parra D: Non-heart-beating donors: an excellent choice to increase the donor pool. Transplant Proc. 2005, 37: 3651-3654.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Daemen JH, de Wit RJ, Bronkhorst MW, Yin M, Heineman E, Kootstra G: Non-heart-beating donor program contributes 40% of kidneys for transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1996, 28: 105-106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Farney AC, Singh RP, Hines MH, Rogers J, Hartmann EL, Reeves-Daniel A, Gautreaux MD, Iskandar SS, Adams PL, Stratta RJ: Experience in renal and extrarenal transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors with selective use of extracorporeal support. J Am Coll Surg. 2008, 206: 1028-1037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlow AD, Metcalfe MS, Johari Y, Elwell R, Veitch PS, Nicholson ML: Case-matched comparison of long-term results of non-heart beating and heart-beating donor renal transplants. Br J Surg. 2009, 96: 685-691.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Benoit G, Bensadoun H, Borie I, Vavasseur G, Gillot C: A double balloon catheter for the procurement of abdominal organs. Ann Urol. 1990, 24: 199-201.Google Scholar
  7. Snoeijs MG, Dekkers AJ, Buurman WA, van den Akker L, Welten RJ, Schurink GW, van Heurn LW: In situ preservation of kidneys from donors after cardiac death: results and complications. Ann Surg. 2007, 246: 844-852.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Valero R, Cabrer C, Oppenheimer F, Trias E, Sánchez-Ibáñez J, De Cabo FM, Navarro A, Paredes D, Alcaraz A, Gutiérrez R, Manyalich M: Normothermic recirculation reduces primary graft dysfunction of kidneys obtained from non-heart-beating donors. Transpl Int. 2000, 13: 303-310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fondevila C, Hessheimer AJ, Ruiz A, Calatayud D, Ferrer J, Charco R, Fuster J, Navasa M, Rimola A, Taurá P, Ginés P, Manyalich M, García-Valdecasas JC: Liver transplant using donors after unexpected cardiac death: novel preservation protocol and acceptance criteria. Am J Transplant. 2007, 7: 1849-1855.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ko WJ, Chen YS, Tsai PR, Lee PH: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support of donor abdominal organs in non-heart-beating donors. Clin Transplant. 2000, 14: 152-156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gravel MT, Arenas JD, Chenault R, Magee JC, Rudich S, Maraschio M, DebRoy M, Miller W, Punch JD: Kidney transplantation from organ donors following cardiopulmonary death using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Ann Transplant. 2004, 9: 57-58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Billault C, Godfroy F, Thibaut F, Bart S, Arzouk N, Van Glabeke E, Fehri K, Ourahma S, Nicolas-Robin A, Barrou B: Organ procurement from donors deceased from cardiac death: a single-center efficiency assessment. Transplant Proc. 2011, 43: 3396-3397.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Antoine C, Brun F, Tenaillon A, Loty B: Organ procurement and transplantation from non-heart-beating donors. Nephrol Ther. 2008, 4: 5-14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Barrou B, Billault C, Nicolas-Robin A: The use of extracorporeal membraneous oxygenation in donors after cardiac death. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2013, 18: 148-153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hauet T, Goujon JM, Baumert H, Petit I, Carretier M, Eugene M, Vandewalle A: Polyethylene glycol reduces the inflammatory injury due to cold ischemia/reperfusion in autotransplanted pig kidneys. Kidney Int. 2002, 62: 654-667.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Giraud S, Thuillier R, Belliard A, Hebrard W, Nadeau C, Milin S, Goujon JM, Manguy E, Mauco G, Hauet T, Macchi L: Direct thrombin inhibitor prevents delayed graft function in a porcine model of renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2009, 87: 1636-1644.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Giraud S, Favreau F, Chatauret N, Thuillier R, Maiga S, Hauet T: Contribution of large pig for renal ischemia-reperfusion and transplantation studies: the preclinical model. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011, 2011: 532127-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fondevila C, Hessheimer AJ, Flores E, Ruiz A, Mestres N, Calatayud D, Paredes D, Rodríguez C, Fuster J, Navasa M, Rimola A, Taurá P, García-Valdecasas JC: Applicability and results of Maastricht type 2 donation after cardiac death liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2012, 12: 162-170.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ausania F, White SA, Coates R, Hulme W, Manas DM: Liver damage during organ donor procurement in donation after circulatory death compared with donation after brain death. Br J Surg. 2013, 100: 381-386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kootstra G, Wijnen R, van Hooff JP, van der Linden CJ: Twenty percent more kidneys through a non-heart beating program. Transplant Proc. 1991, 23: 910-911.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Abboud I, Viglietti D, Antoine C, Gaudez F, Meria P, Tariel E, Mongiat-Artus P, Desgranchamps F, Roussin F, Fieux F, Jacob L, Randoux C, Michel C, Flamant M, Lefaucheur C, Pillebout E, Serrato T, Peraldi MN, Glotz D: Preliminary results of transplantation with kidneys donated after cardiocirculatory determination of death: a French single-center experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012, 27: 2583-2587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Moers C, van Rijt G, Ploeg RJ, Leuvenink HG: The effect of normothermic recirculation before cold preservation on post-transplant injury of ischemically damaged donor kidneys. Transpl Int. 2012, 25: 210-217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hosgood SA, Bagul A, Yang B, Nicholson ML: The relative effects of warm and cold ischemic injury in an experimental model of nonheartbeating donor kidneys. Transplantation. 2008, 85: 88-92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rojas-Pena A, Reoma JL, Krause E, Boothman EL, Padiyar NP, Cook KE, Bartlett RH, Punch JD: Extracorporeal support: improves donor renal graft function after cardiac death. Am J Transplant. 2010, 10: 1365-1374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Allain et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.